<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solid gold minifigs still pending</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jerichobaldosano</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-8761</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:02:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-8761</guid>
					<description>Great post! Very interesting! The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.successdefinition.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;success definition&lt;/a&gt; of a project is based entirely on the efforts done by the employees. I believe that caring for your employees, giving them what's due them like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workaccidents.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;workers compensation&lt;/a&gt; and pass at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.immigrationincanada.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;immigration in Canada&lt;/a&gt; may encourage them to do their work more efficiently.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Great post! Very interesting! The <a href="http://www.successdefinition.net" rel="nofollow">success definition</a> of a project is based entirely on the efforts done by the employees. I believe that caring for your employees, giving them what's due them like <a href="http://www.workaccidents.ca" rel="nofollow">workers compensation</a> and pass at<br />
<a href="http://www.immigrationincanada.ca" rel="nofollow">immigration in Canada</a> may encourage them to do their work more efficiently.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Itsacon</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6262</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6262</guid>
					<description>@blitzgerg: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:591&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Already done&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@blitzgerg: <a href="http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:591" rel="nofollow">Already done</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: corinoco</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6261</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6261</guid>
					<description>The purist in me says aluminium Lego is cheating, but the engineer in me says &quot;DO WANT!&quot;

I noticed in one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://storage.technicbricks.com/Media/2009/TBs_20091230_1/TBs_20091230_1a.jpg&quot; title=&quot;HERESY!&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;links&lt;/a&gt; some extreme heresy in the form of curved beams. I can see how they claim that such beams don't over-stress 2-stud fittings, but it looks to me that 3-stud fittings must involve some serious bending and friction problems and you are going to have to use multi-grips to remove them.

I can understand aluminium though - I had the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nd.edu/~lego/grp2/www/graphics/lego/8860.jpg&quot; title=&quot;Not the Super Car&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Auto Chassis 8860&lt;/a&gt; from 1980 and one of the wheel hubs shattered during a... er... speed run down our very steep driveway. The kit was never the same with only three wheels, and I learned that trikes and motorcycle sidecars are inherently unstable no matter what your maths teacher might say about the stability of tripods. A tripod might be stable, but a moving tripod is an accident looking for a place to happen. I still have the cool shock-absorber parts though, which make for cool starship landing struts or mecha legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The purist in me says aluminium Lego is cheating, but the engineer in me says "DO WANT!"</p>
	<p>I noticed in one of the <a href="http://storage.technicbricks.com/Media/2009/TBs_20091230_1/TBs_20091230_1a.jpg" title="HERESY!" rel="nofollow">links</a> some extreme heresy in the form of curved beams. I can see how they claim that such beams don't over-stress 2-stud fittings, but it looks to me that 3-stud fittings must involve some serious bending and friction problems and you are going to have to use multi-grips to remove them.</p>
	<p>I can understand aluminium though - I had the <a href="http://www.nd.edu/~lego/grp2/www/graphics/lego/8860.jpg" title="Not the Super Car" rel="nofollow">Auto Chassis 8860</a> from 1980 and one of the wheel hubs shattered during a... er... speed run down our very steep driveway. The kit was never the same with only three wheels, and I learned that trikes and motorcycle sidecars are inherently unstable no matter what your maths teacher might say about the stability of tripods. A tripod might be stable, but a moving tripod is an accident looking for a place to happen. I still have the cool shock-absorber parts though, which make for cool starship landing struts or mecha legs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: blizgerg</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6260</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6260</guid>
					<description>What about http://objects.reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page ? The specifications for the model two say minimum feature size of 2mm, that might not be small enough for legos... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What about <a href='http://objects.reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page' rel='nofollow'>http://objects.reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page</a> ? The specifications for the model two say minimum feature size of 2mm, that might not be small enough for legos...
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TwoHedWlf</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6259</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6259</guid>
					<description>I hope not.  That never ends well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope not.  That never ends well...
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: reyalp</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6258</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6258</guid>
					<description>Next stop: lego CNC machine that can machine more lego :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Next stop: lego CNC machine that can machine more lego :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bern</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6257</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2010/01/23/solid-gold-minifigs-still-pending/#comment-6257</guid>
					<description>My jaw dropped when I saw that last vid.  Impressive stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My jaw dropped when I saw that last vid.  Impressive stuff!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

