<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your UFO sightings for today</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: dianemacapagal</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-9103</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-9103</guid>
					<description>I like what you guys are up also. Keep up the superb works guys, I've incorporated this post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.exteriorfrenchdoors.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;French doors&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centerpiecesideas.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;centerpieces ideas&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frontyard.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;landscaping&lt;/a&gt; to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my Halifax airport web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I like what you guys are up also. Keep up the superb works guys, I've incorporated this post about <a href="http://www.exteriorfrenchdoors.ca" rel="nofollow">French doors</a>, <a href="http://www.centerpiecesideas.net" rel="nofollow">centerpieces ideas</a> and <a href="http://www.frontyard.ca" rel="nofollow">landscaping</a> to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my Halifax airport web site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kimlebrons</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-9072</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:14:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-9072</guid>
					<description>Thanks for your wonderful post! I like reading it as well as reading and learning &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.housesellingtips.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;house selling tips&lt;/a&gt;. I have learned that to be able to sell your home in a higher price you should have a high value house. Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitbyhouses.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitby houses&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portperryhouses.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Port Perry homes&lt;/a&gt;. They have higher house values than any of the houses for sale on the area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for your wonderful post! I like reading it as well as reading and learning <a href="http://www.housesellingtips.org" rel="nofollow">house selling tips</a>. I have learned that to be able to sell your home in a higher price you should have a high value house. Like <a href="http://www.whitbyhouses.com" rel="nofollow">Whitby houses</a> and <a href="http://www.portperryhouses.ca" rel="nofollow">Port Perry homes</a>. They have higher house values than any of the houses for sale on the area.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: badcommandorfilename</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-6073</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-6073</guid>
					<description>I'm having trouble seeing how this is more efficient. Even though the vertical lift is being generated by a one bladed propeller, the thrust is provided by a multi-bladed propeller.

In my engineering experience, the best efficiency comes from fewer, larger blades rotating at slower speeds (all of which reduce turbulent flow). The actual driving force of this device comes from a very small, very fast, multibladed propeller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I'm having trouble seeing how this is more efficient. Even though the vertical lift is being generated by a one bladed propeller, the thrust is provided by a multi-bladed propeller.</p>
	<p>In my engineering experience, the best efficiency comes from fewer, larger blades rotating at slower speeds (all of which reduce turbulent flow). The actual driving force of this device comes from a very small, very fast, multibladed propeller.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Richfield</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5995</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5995</guid>
					<description>I came up with the samara idea in the eighties, though I did not at the time realise that the 1-bladed prop was so efficient.  In fact I based the idea on what I was informed was the fastes known protozoan; it used its body as a blade and a single flagellum to spin it like a samara. (Don't ask me about is steering!!!

I soon thought out a lot of frills, like applications and its attributes in combat,but unlike the picture of the model, I was thinking in terms of a ramjet at one end. I also considered having a jet at each end, but rejected it in favour of a jet at one end and controls, camera, weaponry etc at the other. I was uncertain about the practicality of controlling such a device, and suspected that the only practical means would be by warping the surface and adjusting the angle of the  engine. piezoelectric control sounded marvellous, but I did not think that it would be practical. Then I saw on television that a professor of aircraft construction in some southern state (Arizona, Texas, New Mexico,??? Can't remember) was in fact applying such controls experimentally. I e-mailed him, and he was quite encouraging about my idea but whether he took it any further I cannot say. Certainly I could do nothing of the kind, not having any skills that way. Anyone interested in discussing some of my initial ideas about the attributes and possible applications can e-mail me.
Jon Richfield</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I came up with the samara idea in the eighties, though I did not at the time realise that the 1-bladed prop was so efficient.  In fact I based the idea on what I was informed was the fastes known protozoan; it used its body as a blade and a single flagellum to spin it like a samara. (Don't ask me about is steering!!!</p>
	<p>I soon thought out a lot of frills, like applications and its attributes in combat,but unlike the picture of the model, I was thinking in terms of a ramjet at one end. I also considered having a jet at each end, but rejected it in favour of a jet at one end and controls, camera, weaponry etc at the other. I was uncertain about the practicality of controlling such a device, and suspected that the only practical means would be by warping the surface and adjusting the angle of the  engine. piezoelectric control sounded marvellous, but I did not think that it would be practical. Then I saw on television that a professor of aircraft construction in some southern state (Arizona, Texas, New Mexico,??? Can't remember) was in fact applying such controls experimentally. I e-mailed him, and he was quite encouraging about my idea but whether he took it any further I cannot say. Certainly I could do nothing of the kind, not having any skills that way. Anyone interested in discussing some of my initial ideas about the attributes and possible applications can e-mail me.<br />
Jon Richfield
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shadowex3</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5975</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5975</guid>
					<description>Save the weight on that kind of effort and put some dumpable counterweights on one end and a couple grenades on the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Save the weight on that kind of effort and put some dumpable counterweights on one end and a couple grenades on the other.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: aramid</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5974</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5974</guid>
					<description>Since we're talking about a radio-controlled seed pod, you're making the camera issue far too complicated...You shouldn't need any computer wizardry, or any stationary IR source tracking, or anything like that.  You'd be totally set with one fast servo, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acroname.com/robotics/info/ideas/continuous/continuous.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;modified for continuous rotation&lt;/a&gt;, connected to a cheap &lt;a href=&quot;http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&amp;amp;I=LXUSE1&amp;amp;P=ML&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;heading-lock helicopter gyro&lt;/a&gt;.

There are a few drawbacks to this, of course - the camera (and any RF video link) will have to be mostly self-contained and run off their own power source, since there's a pivot between them and the flight batteries, and the mechanical complexity (and therefore durability) is somewhat higher than with the computer-witchcraft approaches.  Still, in at least some applications it seems like a reasonable price to pay for the simpler implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Since we're talking about a radio-controlled seed pod, you're making the camera issue far too complicated...You shouldn't need any computer wizardry, or any stationary IR source tracking, or anything like that.  You'd be totally set with one fast servo, <a href="http://www.acroname.com/robotics/info/ideas/continuous/continuous.html" rel="nofollow">modified for continuous rotation</a>, connected to a cheap <a href="http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&amp;I=LXUSE1&amp;P=ML" rel="nofollow">heading-lock helicopter gyro</a>.</p>
	<p>There are a few drawbacks to this, of course - the camera (and any RF video link) will have to be mostly self-contained and run off their own power source, since there's a pivot between them and the flight batteries, and the mechanical complexity (and therefore durability) is somewhat higher than with the computer-witchcraft approaches.  Still, in at least some applications it seems like a reasonable price to pay for the simpler implementation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mesh</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5973</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5973</guid>
					<description>I'm still not sure how they actually control it, some weak googleing just found a reference to using the earths magnetic field to sense rotation.

Hm, on second viewing of the big model I guess I overestimated the RPM. I was thinking a servo wouldn't be fast enough to twist the blade up and down once every turn, but at about 4 rotations per second it should be doable.

If I were to make a small one, I'd probably try an electromagnetic &quot;servo&quot;, as seen on some cheap foam parkflyers. You could adjust the effective control throw by varying the duty cycle of the magnet. An IR sensor could detect a stationary IR source (maybe on the transmitter) to sense rotation!

Now I want one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I'm still not sure how they actually control it, some weak googleing just found a reference to using the earths magnetic field to sense rotation.</p>
	<p>Hm, on second viewing of the big model I guess I overestimated the RPM. I was thinking a servo wouldn't be fast enough to twist the blade up and down once every turn, but at about 4 rotations per second it should be doable.</p>
	<p>If I were to make a small one, I'd probably try an electromagnetic "servo", as seen on some cheap foam parkflyers. You could adjust the effective control throw by varying the duty cycle of the magnet. An IR sensor could detect a stationary IR source (maybe on the transmitter) to sense rotation!</p>
	<p>Now I want one!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Lineker</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5972</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/11/30/your-ufo-sightings-for-today/#comment-5972</guid>
					<description>Someone please fly the lighted version over a ufo believers conference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Someone please fly the lighted version over a ufo believers conference
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

