<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment preview, only 32 months late!</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jonadab</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5263</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:34:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5263</guid>
					<description>Seems to work here (Firefox 3.0 on Lenny).

It causes an amount of CPU usage that's discernible if one is actively looking at a system monitor applet at the time, so it might cause perf issues on an extremely old system, but I'm writing this on midrange 2005 hardware (albeit, with added RAM) without maxing anything out, so it's clearly not a very big deal.

The more likely compatibility problem someone could run into is a tiny screen (say, on a mobile device) that can't show the textarea and the preview at the same time.  But I suspect that's unavoidable, and they can always scroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Seems to work here (Firefox 3.0 on Lenny).</p>
	<p>It causes an amount of CPU usage that's discernible if one is actively looking at a system monitor applet at the time, so it might cause perf issues on an extremely old system, but I'm writing this on midrange 2005 hardware (albeit, with added RAM) without maxing anything out, so it's clearly not a very big deal.</p>
	<p>The more likely compatibility problem someone could run into is a tiny screen (say, on a mobile device) that can't show the textarea and the preview at the same time.  But I suspect that's unavoidable, and they can always scroll.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stark</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5257</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:51:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5257</guid>
					<description>However...SSBkbyBsaWtlIGVuY29kaW5nIHNjaGVtZXMhDQo=

Exactly what encoding scheme that is, is an exercise for you, the geeks like me!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>However...SSBkbyBsaWtlIGVuY29kaW5nIHNjaGVtZXMhDQo=</p>
	<p>Exactly what encoding scheme that is, is an exercise for you, the geeks like me!  :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stark</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5256</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:48:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5256</guid>
					<description>.. / -.. --- -. .----. - / .-.. .. -.- . / ... .--. .- --
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>.. / -.. --- -. .----. - / .-.. .. -.- . / ... .--. .- --
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5255</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:15:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5255</guid>
					<description>Yeah, fiddling with the new PC (about which I did &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/dansdata/status/2567182486&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/dansdata/status/2567204908&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tweet&lt;/a&gt;!). I've only made it fail to POST once so far, which is a bit disappointing. Must have lost my touch.

I can, however, reveal my results so far in the only benchmark that could possibly matter to anyone: With a spot of overclocking, a Core i7 920 is about 5.7 times as fast for distributed.net's &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golomb_ruler&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OGR&lt;/a&gt; calculator than was my old 2-core Athlon. Hence, a sudden leap in &lt;a href=&quot;http://stats.distributed.net/participant/psummary.php?project_id=27&amp;amp;id=281794&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my OGR stats&lt;/a&gt;.

(Do feel free to make my stats go nuts by all telling dnetc.exe, if you run it, that &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; e-mail address is &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:dan@dansdata.com&quot;&gt;dan@dansdata.com&lt;/a&gt;!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, fiddling with the new PC (about which I did <a href="https://twitter.com/dansdata/status/2567182486" rel="nofollow">just</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/dansdata/status/2567204908" rel="nofollow">tweet</a>!). I've only made it fail to POST once so far, which is a bit disappointing. Must have lost my touch.</p>
	<p>I can, however, reveal my results so far in the only benchmark that could possibly matter to anyone: With a spot of overclocking, a Core i7 920 is about 5.7 times as fast for distributed.net's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golomb_ruler" rel="nofollow">OGR</a> calculator than was my old 2-core Athlon. Hence, a sudden leap in <a href="http://stats.distributed.net/participant/psummary.php?project_id=27&amp;id=281794" rel="nofollow">my OGR stats</a>.</p>
	<p>(Do feel free to make my stats go nuts by all telling dnetc.exe, if you run it, that <i>your</i> e-mail address is <a href="mailto:dan@dansdata.com">dan@dansdata.com</a>!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Popup</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5254</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:04:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5254</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No new posts from Dan for a few days is not entirely unusual, but no new TWEETS from Dan makes me wonder if there's been some kind of accident. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Nah, I'm sure he's just busy assembling his new PC.

I'm looking forwards to reading all about it, as soon as he's managed to put it all together. (I'm sure it's just a matter of minutes while he manages to figure out why the sata cable is two cm too short, how to fit an metric screw in a UNC hole, and how to silence the fans without overheating the graphics card.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<blockquote><p>No new posts from Dan for a few days is not entirely unusual, but no new TWEETS from Dan makes me wonder if there's been some kind of accident. </p></blockquote>
	<p>Nah, I'm sure he's just busy assembling his new PC.</p>
	<p>I'm looking forwards to reading all about it, as soon as he's managed to put it all together. (I'm sure it's just a matter of minutes while he manages to figure out why the sata cable is two cm too short, how to fit an metric screw in a UNC hole, and how to silence the fans without overheating the graphics card.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: phrantic</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5253</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:27:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5253</guid>
					<description>No new posts from Dan for a few days is not entirely unusual, but no new TWEETS from Dan makes me wonder if there's been some kind of accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No new posts from Dan for a few days is not entirely unusual, but no new TWEETS from Dan makes me wonder if there's been some kind of accident.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RichVR</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5252</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:50:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5252</guid>
					<description>... .--. .- -- --..-- / ... .--. .- -- --..-- / -... . .- -. ... --..-- / ... .--. .- -- / .- -. -.. / ... .--. .- -- .-.-.-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>... .--. .- -- --..-- / ... .--. .- -- --..-- / -... . .- -. ... --..-- / ... .--. .- -- / .- -. -.. / ... .--. .- -- .-.-.-
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chazzozz</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5251</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:54:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5251</guid>
					<description>Heh.  Binary is &lt;em&gt;so&lt;/em&gt; 0011000100110000 minutes ago.  Let's try an 8-bit encoding instead:

&lt;strong&gt;436F6D6D656E74207370616D2100&lt;/strong&gt;

Or, for the ham radio enthusiasts out there:

-- --- .-. .   -.-. --- -- -- . -. -   ... .--. .- --

(Gee, the preview works really well.  I was able to spot and correct errors straight away.  Nice.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Heh.  Binary is <em>so</em> 0011000100110000 minutes ago.  Let's try an 8-bit encoding instead:</p>
	<p><strong>436F6D6D656E74207370616D2100</strong></p>
	<p>Or, for the ham radio enthusiasts out there:</p>
	<p>-- --- .-. .   -.-. --- -- -- . -. -   ... .--. .- --</p>
	<p>(Gee, the preview works really well.  I was able to spot and correct errors straight away.  Nice.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stark</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5249</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:18:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5249</guid>
					<description>@ Chazzoz - Indeed, both ways!  

And just for good measure : 
01000111011001010111010000100000011011110110
01100110011001100001001001110010000001101101
01111001001000000110110001100001011101110110
1110001000010000110100001010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@ Chazzoz - Indeed, both ways!  </p>
	<p>And just for good measure :<br />
01000111011001010111010000100000011011110110<br />
01100110011001100001001001110010000001101101<br />
01111001001000000110110001100001011101110110<br />
1110001000010000110100001010
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob M</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5248</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:16:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2009/07/07/comment-preview-only-32-months-late/#comment-5248</guid>
					<description>Testes testes testes... &lt;b&gt;1,2,3&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.i-am-bored.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is this thing on?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;*Tap* *Tap* *Tap*&lt;/i&gt;

Well this seems to work reasonably. After that mangled posting I made a few of days ago, I for one appreciate the ability to fix the postings I put up once every 4 years.

P.S. Thanks Dan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Testes testes testes... <b>1,2,3</b>. <a href="http://www.i-am-bored.com" rel="nofollow">Is this thing on?</a> <i>*Tap* *Tap* *Tap*</i></p>
	<p>Well this seems to work reasonably. After that mangled posting I made a few of days ago, I for one appreciate the ability to fix the postings I put up once every 4 years.</p>
	<p>P.S. Thanks Dan!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

