But more importantly, you've all missed the fact that Mr "Use Power With Le$$ Cost" Steven actually offered some good advice:

Perhaps,spending lesser time in your PC will save more power for you

He's dead right. Turning off your PC for an extra few minutes a day (or leaving it in sleep mode or something) will definitely save more power for you than one of his devices!

best regards,
Steven
Use Power With Le$$ Cost
http://www.epowersaver.com

Alert! Alert! Additional unauthorised link! You must therefore attack yourself with furious anger and great vengeance.

QED

*vanishes in a puff of logic*

This line is particularly interesting. You're suggesting that the device does not work for Australia?

In which regions does your device work, pray tell?

Where did people get this idea that one should have permission to make a link?

You do not get free product by asking them to send you one for test and to prove the product claim.

Actually, yes I do. Happens all the time. I've written literally hundreds of product reviews, and almost all of them are of products that the manufacturer sent me for free. Honestly, my main problem these days is that I've got far too much review product awaiting my attention. But I'd make space for you!

Most of the products I reviewed over the years weren't blatantly fraudulent, of course; I wasn't seeing if they worked, but how well they worked, how they stacked up against the competition, et cetera.

But I have reviewed a few products that're completely worthless. See, for instance, the Batterylife Activator and The Wine Clip. I even got to have a look at an EMPower Modulator once.

As other commenters have pointed out above, if you're so all-fired enthusiastic about "Certified Labs", then get thyself to one and have them see whether your product actually works.

But you don't need a Certified Anything to see if it works. Plug something that the "power saver" is meant to help with into the wall in a house without also plugging in the power saver, make sure nothing else in the house is drawing power (including sneaky stuff like a water heater hiding above the ceiling...), then go outside and time how long it takes for the spinning disk (or whatever the electricity meter's smallest-denomination display is - the digit at the extreme right, for a digital meter) to increment a few steps.

Next, plug your "power saver" into the outlet right next to the test device, then go outside and time the power consumption again.

This technique is a little time-consuming, and can only practically be used with devices that draw power constantly (so, not things like refrigerators), but it gets you directly to the heart of the matter - whether your device will actually save money for normal electricity users.

If you take a shortcut by using an inline multimeter, clamp-meter or one of the cheap power meters that're all over the place these days, you run the risk of measuring apparent power - simple DC-style volts times amps - not the real power that household electricity meters actually measure. Many, many people have made this mistake, including a quite remarkable number of people who, because of this error, think they've invented an electrical perpetual motion machine (...which will surely start working properly as soon as they get rid of whatever it is that's making it grind to a halt every time...).

If your GOD permits all this,by all means follow the way.

Oh, man - are you ever talking to the wrong guy.

I must thank you, though, for taking this unusual religious tack, rather than immediately shouting at me about lawsuits. I suspect that this, if nothing else, puts you well ahead of many of your competitors.

You need to realise that it is you, and people like you that are the problem here, not Dan. If you insist on selling worthless products to an unsuspecting public then you are preying on people’s ignorance and should damn well expect to be called on your unethical behaviour, especially in the no-holds-barred, public arena of the Internet!

However you might try to rationalise your behaviour or attempt to discredit Dan’s motives for calling you on your bullshit, it remains clear to anyone with the slightest education in these things that you are either a fraud or a fool. Dan is doing a public service by taking you to task on your outrageous claims for this device.

Dan has presented nothing but demonstrable facts and empirical evidence. This was not an opinion piece. His observations are backed by well understood scientific principles (well, *we* understand them anyway.)

Now, instead of continuing with your gormless sulking, why not refute Dan’s argument by providing us with *evidence* that your product works as advertised. That’s OK, I’ll wait…