<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smiley sky</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Den Beste</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3683</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3683</guid>
					<description>Interesting how the same names come up. Here in Oregon we also have something called &quot;The Three Sisters&quot;. But ours are a bit bigger:

http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/Sisters/Images/Sisters85_aerial_three_sisters_oregon_09-85_med.jpg

South Sister is the tallest, at 3159 meters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Interesting how the same names come up. Here in Oregon we also have something called "The Three Sisters". But ours are a bit bigger:</p>
	<p><a href='http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/Sisters/Images/Sisters85_aerial_three_sisters_oregon_09-85_med.jpg' rel='nofollow'>http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/Sisters/Images/Sisters85_aerial_three_sisters_oregon_09-85_med.jpg</a></p>
	<p>South Sister is the tallest, at 3159 meters.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3682</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3682</guid>
					<description>The conjunction was actually tilted a bit to the right from my point of view; the camera wasn't level when I took that shot. But yes, it was that way up.

After I ran this moon photo...

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/images/d60/moon.jpg&quot; width=&quot;359&quot; height=&quot;347&quot; alt=&quot;Moon shot&quot;/&gt;

...in my old &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/d60.htm&quot;&gt;EOS-D60 review&lt;/a&gt; (I took it with the same 100-300mm), someone e-mailed me to tell me that I'd run it upside-down by mistake. Then he sent me another message, after he'd remembered where I was :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The conjunction was actually tilted a bit to the right from my point of view; the camera wasn't level when I took that shot. But yes, it was that way up.</p>
	<p>After I ran this moon photo...</p>
	<p><img src="http://www.dansdata.com/images/d60/moon.jpg" width="359" height="347" alt="Moon shot"/></p>
	<p>...in my old <a href="http://www.dansdata.com/d60.htm">EOS-D60 review</a> (I took it with the same 100-300mm), someone e-mailed me to tell me that I'd run it upside-down by mistake. Then he sent me another message, after he'd remembered where I was :-).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ziggyinc</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3681</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3681</guid>
					<description>Heh, I looked at that picture for 5 minutes trying to figure out how your moon ended up on the bottom, then I remembered I'm north of the equator. It looked very different in Hawaii.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Heh, I looked at that picture for 5 minutes trying to figure out how your moon ended up on the bottom, then I remembered I'm north of the equator. It looked very different in Hawaii.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chazzozz</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3680</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3680</guid>
					<description>It's funny how deceptively large they looked in real life.  I doubt that the celestial bodies in SE Qld are physically any large than Eastern NSW, but the planets look very small by comparison in your photograph.

phrantic - I suspect my own photos of the Three Sisters could almost be superimposed over Dan's, too.  I took quite a few from the viewing platform at Echo Point in various spots, so I'm sure that one was close.

Hey Dan, does that painted fellow still play his didgeridoo for all the tourists?  I got quite a chuckle out of seeing all the foreigners 'oohing' and 'aahhing' over the sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It's funny how deceptively large they looked in real life.  I doubt that the celestial bodies in SE Qld are physically any large than Eastern NSW, but the planets look very small by comparison in your photograph.</p>
	<p>phrantic - I suspect my own photos of the Three Sisters could almost be superimposed over Dan's, too.  I took quite a few from the viewing platform at Echo Point in various spots, so I'm sure that one was close.</p>
	<p>Hey Dan, does that painted fellow still play his didgeridoo for all the tourists?  I got quite a chuckle out of seeing all the foreigners 'oohing' and 'aahhing' over the sight.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: phrantic</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3679</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3679</guid>
					<description>I've stood, I think, precisely where you tripod is sitting in that Three Sister's photograph. My best photograph from my Qld-to-Vic roadtrip of the Sisters could almost be overlaid on that one.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I've stood, I think, precisely where you tripod is sitting in that Three Sister's photograph. My best photograph from my Qld-to-Vic roadtrip of the Sisters could almost be overlaid on that one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3678</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3678</guid>
					<description>Yes, you definitely can see Jovian moons with a DSLR, but you need a longer, higher-quality lens than the one I used (just your basic Canon 100-300mm; a telescope adapter can of course do the job), and it won't hurt to to take several images and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shift-and-add&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stack&lt;/a&gt; them, either.

Here's one:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/33403047@N00/2415031970/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2281/2415031970_894bd4db71.jpg&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;202&quot; alt=&quot;Jupiter and moons&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Taken through a telescope with the same not-so-new Canon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/20d_intro.htm&quot;&gt;EOS-20D&lt;/a&gt; that I have. Apparently &quot;about five&quot; stacked exposures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes, you definitely can see Jovian moons with a DSLR, but you need a longer, higher-quality lens than the one I used (just your basic Canon 100-300mm; a telescope adapter can of course do the job), and it won't hurt to to take several images and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shift-and-add" rel="nofollow">stack</a> them, either.</p>
	<p>Here's one:</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/33403047@N00/2415031970/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2281/2415031970_894bd4db71.jpg" width="500" height="202" alt="Jupiter and moons"/></a></p>
	<p>Taken through a telescope with the same not-so-new Canon <a href="http://www.dansdata.com/20d_intro.htm">EOS-20D</a> that I have. Apparently "about five" stacked exposures.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: loseweightslow</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3677</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3677</guid>
					<description>Erik T, I can assure you that a DSLR can trivially photograph the moons of Jupiter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Erik T, I can assure you that a DSLR can trivially photograph the moons of Jupiter.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik T</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3676</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3676</guid>
					<description>Are you being sarcastic? 10x25s capture a fair bit more light than a DSLR, and I doubt any commercially-available camera sensor can approach the sensitivity of the dark-adjusted human eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Are you being sarcastic? 10x25s capture a fair bit more light than a DSLR, and I doubt any commercially-available camera sensor can approach the sensitivity of the dark-adjusted human eye.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rave</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3675</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3675</guid>
					<description>I don't see any moons round Jupiter? I can spot them with a pair of 10x25s, so I'm a bit disappointed that a Digital SLR can't pick them up, especially as I just splashed out on an EOS 450D:(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don't see any moons round Jupiter? I can spot them with a pair of 10x25s, so I'm a bit disappointed that a Digital SLR can't pick them up, especially as I just splashed out on an EOS 450D:(.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hubris</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3674</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/12/02/smiley-sky/#comment-3674</guid>
					<description>OK - so you're saying that up there in the Blue Mountains, where folks 'r' special 'n' all (not necessarily all feral, crystal-gazing hillbillies- more towards the subverting-the-dominant-paradigm kind of special), you approached some tourists, asked them for their email address and possibly mentioned that you'd post some photos for them on your blog - what's it called again? That's right - How to Spot a Psychopath. Knowing full well that &quot;blog&quot; was probably mountain-slang for bloody log still slick with the blood of your previous victims, you're surprised that they hopped straight back into their SUV and roared down the M4 back to Mosman, triple checking the doors and windows that night?

&lt;i&gt;[I didn't feel the need to mention the blog - I just sent them the Flickr link. And I kept all of the knives in my pockets. Not making &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; darn mistake again, I can tell you - all running along the Cliff Walk in the dark, with the mud puddles and the tripping tree roots and getting a headache from all the darn screaming and begging and &quot;no, no, please, I have children...&quot; Then when you're done with what should only have taken ten seconds in the first place, you have to drag the body up a bunch of stairs. That does tenderise it a bit, though. -Dan]&lt;/i&gt;

P.S. Love the mountains - make an annual pilgrimage with the rug rats up to the Thomas the Tank Engine sessions at the Zig-zag Railway and stay overnight somewhere. Jokes aside, though, how does a died-in-the-wool skeptic fit in amongst the very herbal mountain folk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OK - so you're saying that up there in the Blue Mountains, where folks 'r' special 'n' all (not necessarily all feral, crystal-gazing hillbillies- more towards the subverting-the-dominant-paradigm kind of special), you approached some tourists, asked them for their email address and possibly mentioned that you'd post some photos for them on your blog - what's it called again? That's right - How to Spot a Psychopath. Knowing full well that "blog" was probably mountain-slang for bloody log still slick with the blood of your previous victims, you're surprised that they hopped straight back into their SUV and roared down the M4 back to Mosman, triple checking the doors and windows that night?</p>
	<p><i>[I didn't feel the need to mention the blog - I just sent them the Flickr link. And I kept all of the knives in my pockets. Not making <b>that</b> darn mistake again, I can tell you - all running along the Cliff Walk in the dark, with the mud puddles and the tripping tree roots and getting a headache from all the darn screaming and begging and "no, no, please, I have children..." Then when you're done with what should only have taken ten seconds in the first place, you have to drag the body up a bunch of stairs. That does tenderise it a bit, though. -Dan]</i></p>
	<p>P.S. Love the mountains - make an annual pilgrimage with the rug rats up to the Thomas the Tank Engine sessions at the Zig-zag Railway and stay overnight somewhere. Jokes aside, though, how does a died-in-the-wool skeptic fit in amongst the very herbal mountain folk?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

