<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old lens, new camera</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Popup</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/#comment-3293</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:11:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/#comment-3293</guid>
					<description>Talking about FourThirds, what do you think about the new micro FourThirds, and specifically the Panasonic Lumix-G1? Finally a digital camera with removable lenses that doesn't bother with the historical baggage of a pentaprism and the awkward mechanism of a moving mirror. I know that a hard-core photographer like yourself probably wouldn't appreciate that, but for a newbie used to point-and-shoot cameras, but envious of those nice big (albeit awkward) removable lenses it looks like a decent compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Talking about FourThirds, what do you think about the new micro FourThirds, and specifically the Panasonic Lumix-G1? Finally a digital camera with removable lenses that doesn't bother with the historical baggage of a pentaprism and the awkward mechanism of a moving mirror. I know that a hard-core photographer like yourself probably wouldn't appreciate that, but for a newbie used to point-and-shoot cameras, but envious of those nice big (albeit awkward) removable lenses it looks like a decent compromise.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: davolfman</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/#comment-3292</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:21:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/#comment-3292</guid>
					<description>I'll bet it's a pain in the butt to have to hold down the stop-down tab on the lens every time you take a picture though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I'll bet it's a pain in the butt to have to hold down the stop-down tab on the lens every time you take a picture though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: evilspoons</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/#comment-3291</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:21:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/12/old-lens-new-camera/#comment-3291</guid>
					<description>I am rather happy all of my dad's old Pentax K-mount lenses work with the new KAF-mount DSLRs. Compatibility back to 1973 without adapters, and an available M42 adapter will get you back to &lt;strong&gt;1949&lt;/strong&gt;. I quite like using the manual f/1.2 lens he's got. The only problem is the APS/35mm conversion factor you mention - the 50mm lens, usually quite good for everyday shots, turns into a sort of telephoto lens that is hard to use in many situations. Fantastic image quality though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am rather happy all of my dad's old Pentax K-mount lenses work with the new KAF-mount DSLRs. Compatibility back to 1973 without adapters, and an available M42 adapter will get you back to <strong>1949</strong>. I quite like using the manual f/1.2 lens he's got. The only problem is the APS/35mm conversion factor you mention - the 50mm lens, usually quite good for everyday shots, turns into a sort of telephoto lens that is hard to use in many situations. Fantastic image quality though!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

