<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You need a Lego earthmover</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: HitScan</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3242</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:40:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3242</guid>
					<description>I lusted after that 8880 when I was in middle school. A few years ago I found one on eBay, unopened. Worth every (very many of) penny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I lusted after that 8880 when I was in middle school. A few years ago I found one on eBay, unopened. Worth every (very many of) penny.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Red October</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3223</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:36:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3223</guid>
					<description>I've recently gotten back into Lego and picked up the &quot;Cherry picker&quot; model, although I assembled the alternate model (A flatbed truck) in part because I've actually driven a flatbed truck.  (Yeasty old Ford F-600 with 3+low &quot;rock crusher&quot; gearbox.)  It too used the huge plate, as a truck bed.  I was surprised how much technic had changed; there was actually a clutch included that HAD PRINTED ON IT HOW MUCH FORCE IT WOULD LET THROUGH.  This fairly well blew my mind.

Ah, but tracks.  They have always been a problem.  They were only included in the sets I could never convince people to buy me as a kid (the largest set I was gifted with was 6984 Galactic Mediator) ...  I once tried to stretch a thin tire over two small wheel axles... that didn't turn out well.  But dammit, now I WANT to build a Lego Panzer V.  I also could make a good 20mm Vulcan cannon out of long rods and several thin pulleys.  Properly adapted it could mate to the small motor and even turn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I've recently gotten back into Lego and picked up the "Cherry picker" model, although I assembled the alternate model (A flatbed truck) in part because I've actually driven a flatbed truck.  (Yeasty old Ford F-600 with 3+low "rock crusher" gearbox.)  It too used the huge plate, as a truck bed.  I was surprised how much technic had changed; there was actually a clutch included that HAD PRINTED ON IT HOW MUCH FORCE IT WOULD LET THROUGH.  This fairly well blew my mind.</p>
	<p>Ah, but tracks.  They have always been a problem.  They were only included in the sets I could never convince people to buy me as a kid (the largest set I was gifted with was 6984 Galactic Mediator) ...  I once tried to stretch a thin tire over two small wheel axles... that didn't turn out well.  But dammit, now I WANT to build a Lego Panzer V.  I also could make a good 20mm Vulcan cannon out of long rods and several thin pulleys.  Properly adapted it could mate to the small motor and even turn!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3222</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:57:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3222</guid>
					<description>If you're just after the new-style treads and wheels to drive them, by the way, then the value-for-money winner is clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://guide.lugnet.com/set/7645&quot;&gt;set 7645&lt;/a&gt;, the &quot;MT-61 Crystal Reaper&quot; from the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://guide.lugnet.com/set/?qc=lego/system/marsmission&quot;&gt;Mars Mission&lt;/a&gt;&quot; line. It's got a list price of $US50, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/7645-1&quot;&gt;gives you&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;seventy&lt;/b&gt; of the new Link Treads (in black instead of the Technic grey), and &lt;b&gt;six&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/57519&quot;&gt;large drive wheels&lt;/a&gt;, which can only otherwise be found in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://guide.lugnet.com/set/8275&quot;&gt;monstrous 8275 Bulldozer&lt;/a&gt; (which is $US150, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/8275-1&quot;&gt;has&lt;/a&gt; motors and 84 grey tread links). The 8294 Excavator lists for ten US dollars more but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/8294-1&quot;&gt;gives you&lt;/a&gt; only sixty tread links and four &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/57520&quot;&gt;small drive wheels&lt;/a&gt;.

The Crystal Reaper even has some other Technic pieces - pins, gears, liftarms and even old-style studded beams, plus oddities like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/57585&quot;&gt;three-axle bush&lt;/a&gt;. It's got a lot of spacey pieces as well, but it's surprisingly close to being a Mislabeled Technic Parts Pack. If you can get it for 20% off or something, do not hesitate.

(I've given tread-link shopping &lt;a href=&quot;http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/06/track-hunting/&quot;&gt;its own post&lt;/a&gt;, now. You can get links and drive wheels surprisingly cheaply on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bricklink.com/&quot;&gt;BrickLink&lt;/a&gt;!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you're just after the new-style treads and wheels to drive them, by the way, then the value-for-money winner is clearly <a href="http://guide.lugnet.com/set/7645">set 7645</a>, the "MT-61 Crystal Reaper" from the "<a href="http://guide.lugnet.com/set/?qc=lego/system/marsmission">Mars Mission</a>" line. It's got a list price of $US50, but <a href="http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/7645-1">gives you</a> <b>seventy</b> of the new Link Treads (in black instead of the Technic grey), and <b>six</b> <a href="http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/57519">large drive wheels</a>, which can only otherwise be found in the <a href="http://guide.lugnet.com/set/8275">monstrous 8275 Bulldozer</a> (which is $US150, but <a href="http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/8275-1">has</a> motors and 84 grey tread links). The 8294 Excavator lists for ten US dollars more but <a href="http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/8294-1">gives you</a> only sixty tread links and four <a href="http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/57520">small drive wheels</a>.</p>
	<p>The Crystal Reaper even has some other Technic pieces - pins, gears, liftarms and even old-style studded beams, plus oddities like the <a href="http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/57585">three-axle bush</a>. It's got a lot of spacey pieces as well, but it's surprisingly close to being a Mislabeled Technic Parts Pack. If you can get it for 20% off or something, do not hesitate.</p>
	<p>(I've given tread-link shopping <a href="http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/06/track-hunting/">its own post</a>, now. You can get links and drive wheels surprisingly cheaply on <a href="http://www.bricklink.com/">BrickLink</a>!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3221</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 12:21:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3221</guid>
					<description>Yes - but I don't have any Power Functions motors, so I think I'll motorise the excavator by hanging one of the big chunky 4.5V &quot;Basic&quot; motors off the back.

I think I'll use a yellow one :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes - but I don't have any Power Functions motors, so I think I'll motorise the excavator by hanging one of the big chunky 4.5V "Basic" motors off the back.</p>
	<p>I think I'll use a yellow one :-).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik T</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3220</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:13:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3220</guid>
					<description>Oh, I was also _profoundly_ impressed by how well Lego is integrating motors and battery packs now. Truly, the envelope of the thing does not change at all after motorization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, I was also _profoundly_ impressed by how well Lego is integrating motors and battery packs now. Truly, the envelope of the thing does not change at all after motorization.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Siridar</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3219</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:21:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3219</guid>
					<description>Curse you, Dan! I went to K-mart today intending to buy the excavator, but instead, I walked out with the 8297 offroader instead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Curse you, Dan! I went to K-mart today intending to buy the excavator, but instead, I walked out with the 8297 offroader instead!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rndmnmbr</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3218</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:54:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3218</guid>
					<description>&quot;I agree with #2, there is definitely still a place for the studded Technic beams&quot;

Something like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brickset.com/detail.aspx?Set=8275-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is a step in the right direction, combining the strength of both Technic paradigms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>"I agree with #2, there is definitely still a place for the studded Technic beams"</p>
	<p>Something like <a href="http://www.brickset.com/detail.aspx?Set=8275-1" rel="nofollow">this</a> is a step in the right direction, combining the strength of both Technic paradigms.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik T</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3216</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:27:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3216</guid>
					<description>I got it this week, just because I knew I had to play with the actuators. It's an amazing kit; a 1000pc Technic set for fifty or sixty bucks is something that I'm still trying to wrap my mind around.

I agree with #2, there is definitely still a place for the studded Technic beams. The current system is great for specialized things like this, but I think it'd be much more difficult for a kid to come up with a functional creation of his/her own. And of course, a mixed Technic/solid model with parts like this is very difficult to achieve. Like the pneumatic/linear actuator situation, I think there's an important place for both, and I hope there are future Technic kits that are studded-beam-focused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I got it this week, just because I knew I had to play with the actuators. It's an amazing kit; a 1000pc Technic set for fifty or sixty bucks is something that I'm still trying to wrap my mind around.</p>
	<p>I agree with #2, there is definitely still a place for the studded Technic beams. The current system is great for specialized things like this, but I think it'd be much more difficult for a kid to come up with a functional creation of his/her own. And of course, a mixed Technic/solid model with parts like this is very difficult to achieve. Like the pneumatic/linear actuator situation, I think there's an important place for both, and I hope there are future Technic kits that are studded-beam-focused.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rndmnmbr</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3214</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:55:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3214</guid>
					<description>This is seriously an awesome kit.  I bought it for the actuators, as I knew it would be nigh-impossible to have motorized steering without either a servo motor (expensive) or massive gearbox (clunky).  The actuators are perfect for the application.

Although I do miss the old studded brick.  It made some things easier due to the fact that you could just stack them, plus it was easier to visualize what you were building.

Now if I could just lay my hands on a radio control box and a wireless webcam with decent bandwidth, so I could make my telepresent crawler bot idea work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is seriously an awesome kit.  I bought it for the actuators, as I knew it would be nigh-impossible to have motorized steering without either a servo motor (expensive) or massive gearbox (clunky).  The actuators are perfect for the application.</p>
	<p>Although I do miss the old studded brick.  It made some things easier due to the fact that you could just stack them, plus it was easier to visualize what you were building.</p>
	<p>Now if I could just lay my hands on a radio control box and a wireless webcam with decent bandwidth, so I could make my telepresent crawler bot idea work
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: unfunk</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3213</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:48:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/10/04/you-need-a-lego-earthmover/#comment-3213</guid>
					<description>Dear Dan,
Screw you.
Love,
unfunk's wallet

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Dan,<br />
Screw you.<br />
Love,<br />
unfunk's wallet</p>
	<p>:D
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

