<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your daily dose of psychoceramicity</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-4589</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-4589</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I noticed the other day that adamsplatform.com.au seems to have bitten the dust.

All there was in the adamsplatform.pdf file was that one diagram, though, so it is preserved in all its magnificence in that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/images/blog/adams_big.png&quot;&gt;image file&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, I noticed the other day that adamsplatform.com.au seems to have bitten the dust.</p>
	<p>All there was in the adamsplatform.pdf file was that one diagram, though, so it is preserved in all its magnificence in that <a href="http://www.dansdata.com/images/blog/adams_big.png">image file</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ka9q</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-4588</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-4588</guid>
					<description>You're quite right, the Adam Clark I met circa 2004 seemed like a perfectly sane guy who knew exactly what he was doing: committing fraud by exploiting people with many more dollars than technical sense.
BTW, his website now shows a default page. So it's gone into oblivion like the dozens of magical compression schemes before it.

I wonder whatever happened to his money. And how he's managed to stay out of jail.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You're quite right, the Adam Clark I met circa 2004 seemed like a perfectly sane guy who knew exactly what he was doing: committing fraud by exploiting people with many more dollars than technical sense.<br />
BTW, his website now shows a default page. So it's gone into oblivion like the dozens of magical compression schemes before it.</p>
	<p>I wonder whatever happened to his money. And how he's managed to stay out of jail.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonadab</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2541</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:37:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2541</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt; I’ve heard it said that one sign of schizophrenia is 
&amp;gt; the ability to hold contradictory thoughts in one’s head.

Actually, almost all humans do that, to a greater or lesser extent.  Schizophrenics are just more egregious about it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt; I’ve heard it said that one sign of schizophrenia is<br />
&gt; the ability to hold contradictory thoughts in one’s head.</p>
	<p>Actually, almost all humans do that, to a greater or lesser extent.  Schizophrenics are just more egregious about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Starlite</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2532</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:41:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2532</guid>
					<description>Well-spotted, Axiom.  The compression scheme, as outlined in the US patent, involved choosing four colours and expressing all other pixels as a multiple of one (or possibly two) of those colours.  If I hadn't deliberately been trying to keep an open mind, I would have realised on day one that this meant an untenable reduction in the colour space.  Without actually wasting my time deciphering the diagram, the colour coefficients leap out at me; it seems pretty clear why the patent ended up as it did once Adam was pressed by a patent attorney.

As for Adam himself...  I've heard it said that one sign of schizophrenia is the ability to hold contradictory thoughts in one's head.  Alternatively, to be able to believe 100% in something one knows is a lie.  This was exactly what I observed in Adam when the house of cards began its collapse.  It was his own unwavering conviction that made him so difficult to dismiss, or to catch out.

As to how he pulled it off?  Mostly sleight of hand, both physical and technological.

I was certain he'd land in jail.  Oh, well, that's corporate law for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well-spotted, Axiom.  The compression scheme, as outlined in the US patent, involved choosing four colours and expressing all other pixels as a multiple of one (or possibly two) of those colours.  If I hadn't deliberately been trying to keep an open mind, I would have realised on day one that this meant an untenable reduction in the colour space.  Without actually wasting my time deciphering the diagram, the colour coefficients leap out at me; it seems pretty clear why the patent ended up as it did once Adam was pressed by a patent attorney.</p>
	<p>As for Adam himself...  I've heard it said that one sign of schizophrenia is the ability to hold contradictory thoughts in one's head.  Alternatively, to be able to believe 100% in something one knows is a lie.  This was exactly what I observed in Adam when the house of cards began its collapse.  It was his own unwavering conviction that made him so difficult to dismiss, or to catch out.</p>
	<p>As to how he pulled it off?  Mostly sleight of hand, both physical and technological.</p>
	<p>I was certain he'd land in jail.  Oh, well, that's corporate law for you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Axiom</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2525</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:01:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2525</guid>
					<description>Actually, most of the diagram appears to be a lossy per-pixel compression scheme that tries to preserve something like an arguably-reasonable dynamic range (i.e., if red was much brighter than green before compression, it should come out the other side also brighter).  Of course, the problem is that there's nothing in the algorithm to preserve the state of the neighboring pixels.  The net effect should be something like the &quot;portrait&quot; mode of image processing.  Kind of a blotchy water-color effect.  The spiral paths may be trying to spread the botches out but I suspect that the visual effect would be more like what you would see with crayons when you don't remember to color only in one direction.

Unless I'm completely misunderstanding the diagram and the flow chart, of course.

And, no, I don't know what the equation at the bottom is supposed to be, unless it's an overall gamma to approximate the base brightness of the image.

Or it could just be lunacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Actually, most of the diagram appears to be a lossy per-pixel compression scheme that tries to preserve something like an arguably-reasonable dynamic range (i.e., if red was much brighter than green before compression, it should come out the other side also brighter).  Of course, the problem is that there's nothing in the algorithm to preserve the state of the neighboring pixels.  The net effect should be something like the "portrait" mode of image processing.  Kind of a blotchy water-color effect.  The spiral paths may be trying to spread the botches out but I suspect that the visual effect would be more like what you would see with crayons when you don't remember to color only in one direction.</p>
	<p>Unless I'm completely misunderstanding the diagram and the flow chart, of course.</p>
	<p>And, no, I don't know what the equation at the bottom is supposed to be, unless it's an overall gamma to approximate the base brightness of the image.</p>
	<p>Or it could just be lunacy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2524</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:05:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2524</guid>
					<description>Gene Ray has not, to my knowledge, done anything in the last ten years to suggest that he does not absolutely 100% believe his Time Cube theory.

The above diagram is exactly the sort of thing that the cleverer sort of schizophrenia sufferer often generates, but I don't think Adam Clark is that sort of fellow - or, at least, he wasn't a few years ago when he was scamming people with the Adams Platform.

Then again, I also have no strong reason to suppose that Adam Clark actually had anything to do with this new &quot;missing algorithm&quot;. Mr Anderson's e-mail, in contrast, is practically diagnostic of some sort of delusional disorder all by itself. For all I know, he thinks Adam Clark sent Diagram A to him by mental telepathy.

(I'm not about to correspond with Mr Anderson to determine his beliefs about the provenance of the diagram; &lt;a href=&quot;/2008/04/04/words-of-wisdom-from-my-favourite-lunatic/&quot;&gt;this guy&lt;/a&gt; gives me all the crackpottery I can handle already.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gene Ray has not, to my knowledge, done anything in the last ten years to suggest that he does not absolutely 100% believe his Time Cube theory.</p>
	<p>The above diagram is exactly the sort of thing that the cleverer sort of schizophrenia sufferer often generates, but I don't think Adam Clark is that sort of fellow - or, at least, he wasn't a few years ago when he was scamming people with the Adams Platform.</p>
	<p>Then again, I also have no strong reason to suppose that Adam Clark actually had anything to do with this new "missing algorithm". Mr Anderson's e-mail, in contrast, is practically diagnostic of some sort of delusional disorder all by itself. For all I know, he thinks Adam Clark sent Diagram A to him by mental telepathy.</p>
	<p>(I'm not about to correspond with Mr Anderson to determine his beliefs about the provenance of the diagram; <a href="/2008/04/04/words-of-wisdom-from-my-favourite-lunatic/">this guy</a> gives me all the crackpottery I can handle already.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HitScan</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2523</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:51:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2523</guid>
					<description>It's a shame that this guy and the Timecube guy are likely just silly frauds. If they both really believed what they're tossing about, I imagine locking the two of them into the same room for a couple hours with a crayon, paper, and hidden camera would be the top grossing comedy for 6 years running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It's a shame that this guy and the Timecube guy are likely just silly frauds. If they both really believed what they're tossing about, I imagine locking the two of them into the same room for a couple hours with a crayon, paper, and hidden camera would be the top grossing comedy for 6 years running.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jax184</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2513</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:54:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2513</guid>
					<description>Along with some sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Along with some sense...
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J-H</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2509</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:57:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2509</guid>
					<description>That equation at the bottom is short of at least 2 brackets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That equation at the bottom is short of at least 2 brackets.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2508</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:36:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/06/07/your-daily-dose-of-psychoceramicity/#comment-2508</guid>
					<description>Fixed now. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fixed now. Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
