<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More perpetual motion - with video this time!</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: evilspoons</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/#comment-2069</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/#comment-2069</guid>
					<description>I've taken a university-level course on AC and DC motors, magnetic circuits, and the like, and I am certain that some basic circuit analysis would show why this experiment is completely pointless. Essentially, he's moving (some of) the back EMF to a different location, but due to the whole equal-and-opposite-reaction thing, it's extremely doubtful it can be made to do any *useful* work (i.e. increase efficiency).

I don't remember enough specifics (the inner workings of electric motors are an extraordinarily dry subject in my mind) but the one thing I do recall is we *always* took measurements that would allow us to calculate efficiency and I don't see anything here to do that, thus making the whole exercise completely pointless. Call me back if a manufacturer picks up this guy's idea, but I don't think they're going to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I've taken a university-level course on AC and DC motors, magnetic circuits, and the like, and I am certain that some basic circuit analysis would show why this experiment is completely pointless. Essentially, he's moving (some of) the back EMF to a different location, but due to the whole equal-and-opposite-reaction thing, it's extremely doubtful it can be made to do any *useful* work (i.e. increase efficiency).</p>
	<p>I don't remember enough specifics (the inner workings of electric motors are an extraordinarily dry subject in my mind) but the one thing I do recall is we *always* took measurements that would allow us to calculate efficiency and I don't see anything here to do that, thus making the whole exercise completely pointless. Call me back if a manufacturer picks up this guy's idea, but I don't think they're going to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JG</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/#comment-2061</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/#comment-2061</guid>
					<description>From my fairly rusty understanding of electric motors, its been a while, I'm fairly sure this is a load of codswallop, I don't think back EMF will do what he wants it to be doing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>From my fairly rusty understanding of electric motors, its been a while, I'm fairly sure this is a load of codswallop, I don't think back EMF will do what he wants it to be doing
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ziggyinc</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/#comment-2057</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2008/02/08/more-perpetual-motion-with-video-this-time/#comment-2057</guid>
					<description>I noticed that he doesn't even mention the word Current, nor with his overly elaborate setup seem to be monitoring current at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I noticed that he doesn't even mention the word Current, nor with his overly elaborate setup seem to be monitoring current at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

