<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: See-through aviation</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Changes</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/#comment-1685</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/#comment-1685</guid>
					<description>Quite sure. I bought it in a very large store in Switzerland. I'd be surprised if large stores could get away with selling knockoffs branded as the real things. 

Well, to tell you the truth, if it happened here in Italy I wouldn't be surprised at all. But I believe the Swiss have harsher rules for this sort of stuff, and there are people who actually care.

Plus, mine seems to have all the relevant stickers and logos and whatnot.

That said, yes, I certainly can believe there are some awful knockoffs, but based on what I've read while lurking (with the occasional post every now and then...) on RCGroups I think most are pretty good, with the bad ones being the exception rather than the rule.

Then again I haven't been on RCG for a while, maybe things have changed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Quite sure. I bought it in a very large store in Switzerland. I&#8217;d be surprised if large stores could get away with selling knockoffs branded as the real things. </p>
	<p>Well, to tell you the truth, if it happened here in Italy I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised at all. But I believe the Swiss have harsher rules for this sort of stuff, and there are people who actually care.</p>
	<p>Plus, mine seems to have all the relevant stickers and logos and whatnot.</p>
	<p>That said, yes, I certainly can believe there are some awful knockoffs, but based on what I&#8217;ve read while lurking (with the occasional post every now and then&#8230;) on RCGroups I think most are pretty good, with the bad ones being the exception rather than the rule.</p>
	<p>Then again I haven&#8217;t been on RCG for a while, maybe things have changed&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/#comment-1681</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/#comment-1681</guid>
					<description>I said &quot;often inferior&quot;, not &quot;always inferior&quot; :-).

There are so many Picoo Z knockoffs out there that it's impossible to make a blanket statement about them. Perhaps the average quality now is better than it used to be; when the first wave of counterfeits struck last year, a lot of them were pretty dreadful.

(Incidentally, are you quite sure that your hard-to-fly &quot;original&quot; Picoo Z actually &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an original one? 'Cos the early knockoffs not only looked almost exactly like the genuine helicopters, but were also often &lt;a href=&quot;http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650223561,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;sold&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; as Picoo Zs!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I said &#8220;often inferior&#8221;, not &#8220;always inferior&#8221; :-).</p>
	<p>There are so many Picoo Z knockoffs out there that it&#8217;s impossible to make a blanket statement about them. Perhaps the average quality now is better than it used to be; when the first wave of counterfeits struck last year, a lot of them were pretty dreadful.</p>
	<p>(Incidentally, are you quite sure that your hard-to-fly &#8220;original&#8221; Picoo Z actually <i>is</i> an original one? &#8216;Cos the early knockoffs not only looked almost exactly like the genuine helicopters, but were also often <a href="http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650223561,00.html" rel="nofollow"><i>sold</i></a> as Picoo Zs!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Changes</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/#comment-1680</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 02:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/see-through-aviation/#comment-1680</guid>
					<description>I disagree on the inferiority of the knockoff Picoo Z models. I have both an original and a knockoff (this one: http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.1252 ) and the knockoff is MUCH more controllable and pleasant to fly. The original behaves like a mad bee or something, and cost me twice as much. Only thing the knockoff lacks is some power... it's slower to go up than the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I disagree on the inferiority of the knockoff Picoo Z models. I have both an original and a knockoff (this one: <a href='http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.1252' rel='nofollow'>http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.1252</a> ) and the knockoff is MUCH more controllable and pleasant to fly. The original behaves like a mad bee or something, and cost me twice as much. Only thing the knockoff lacks is some power&#8230; it&#8217;s slower to go up than the original.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
