<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trial by press release</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bedlam</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1579</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1579</guid>
					<description>On a slightly related note was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/downer-knew-about-awb-kickbacks/2007/11/19/1195321695303.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; from yesterday.

The precis being that with exquisite timing, given the impending election, Australia's top trade official in the Middle East at the time is claiming the government knew all about the AWB scandal.

Oh, and by the way, he's since quit that post and become the CEO of Firepower.

And there's that small matter of the child sex charges.

So, good work all round, Mr Finnin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>On a slightly related note was <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/downer-knew-about-awb-kickbacks/2007/11/19/1195321695303.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> from yesterday.</p>
	<p>The precis being that with exquisite timing, given the impending election, Australia&#8217;s top trade official in the Middle East at the time is claiming the government knew all about the AWB scandal.</p>
	<p>Oh, and by the way, he&#8217;s since quit that post and become the CEO of Firepower.</p>
	<p>And there&#8217;s that small matter of the child sex charges.</p>
	<p>So, good work all round, Mr Finnin!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1578</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1578</guid>
					<description>If you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;c2coff=1&amp;amp;safe=off&amp;amp;q=%22Innovation+in+Fuel+Technology%22+%22institute+of+transport%22&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; for &quot;Innovation in Fuel Technology&quot; and &quot;institute of transport&quot;, you will discover that the prize that Firepower are presumably talking about turns out to actually be the &quot;Innovation in Fuel Technology &lt;b&gt;2008&lt;/b&gt; Award&quot;.

(Suggestions about why this Institute's handing out their 2008 awards in 2007 are invited.)

This Award appears to have been given to something called &quot;DiesoLiFT&quot;, made by a company that calls itself &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internationalfuel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;International Fuel Technology&lt;/a&gt;, which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?&amp;amp;q=%22International%20Fuel%20Technology%22%20firepower&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;does not obviously&lt;/a&gt; actually have anything to do with FirePower.

I suppose the press-release claim &lt;i&gt;from&lt;/i&gt; Firepower means that International Fuel Technology is another of their brands. The claims being made for the DiesoLiFT (and &quot;GasoLiFT&quot;, and &quot;KeroLiFT&quot;) products certainly do seem to echo the claims made for the fuel conditioners that first brought Firepower &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/danletters173.htm#firepower&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to my attention&lt;/a&gt;.

All of those claims may, of course, actually make these substances &lt;i&gt;worthy&lt;/i&gt; of an Award or three, if the claims are true. Countless &lt;a href=&quot;/2007/01/05/the-things-people-will-believe-two-connected-aspects/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dodgy awards&lt;/a&gt; have been given to people at trade shows in the past, though; heck, &lt;a href=&quot;/2007/04/24/break-the-laws-o-physics-win-a-prize/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sometimes&lt;/a&gt; they become TV stars! Little-known awards by themselves don't mean anything.

Were I a dark and cynical soul, I might wonder whether International Fuel Technology is what Firepower will call themselves next, when their current incarnation, like their past ones, sinks beneath the waves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;c2coff=1&amp;safe=off&amp;q=%22Innovation+in+Fuel+Technology%22+%22institute+of+transport%22" rel="nofollow">search</a> for &#8220;Innovation in Fuel Technology&#8221; and &#8220;institute of transport&#8221;, you will discover that the prize that Firepower are presumably talking about turns out to actually be the &#8220;Innovation in Fuel Technology <b>2008</b> Award&#8221;.</p>
	<p>(Suggestions about why this Institute&#8217;s handing out their 2008 awards in 2007 are invited.)</p>
	<p>This Award appears to have been given to something called &#8220;DiesoLiFT&#8221;, made by a company that calls itself <a href="http://www.internationalfuel.com/" rel="nofollow">International Fuel Technology</a>, which <a href="http://www.google.com/search?&amp;q=%22International%20Fuel%20Technology%22%20firepower" rel="nofollow">does not obviously</a> actually have anything to do with FirePower.</p>
	<p>I suppose the press-release claim <i>from</i> Firepower means that International Fuel Technology is another of their brands. The claims being made for the DiesoLiFT (and &#8220;GasoLiFT&#8221;, and &#8220;KeroLiFT&#8221;) products certainly do seem to echo the claims made for the fuel conditioners that first brought Firepower <a href="http://www.dansdata.com/danletters173.htm#firepower" rel="nofollow">to my attention</a>.</p>
	<p>All of those claims may, of course, actually make these substances <i>worthy</i> of an Award or three, if the claims are true. Countless <a href="/2007/01/05/the-things-people-will-believe-two-connected-aspects/" rel="nofollow">dodgy awards</a> have been given to people at trade shows in the past, though; heck, <a href="/2007/04/24/break-the-laws-o-physics-win-a-prize/" rel="nofollow">sometimes</a> they become TV stars! Little-known awards by themselves don&#8217;t mean anything.</p>
	<p>Were I a dark and cynical soul, I might wonder whether International Fuel Technology is what Firepower will call themselves next, when their current incarnation, like their past ones, sinks beneath the waves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stark</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1577</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1577</guid>
					<description>Hmm.. a quick look over the Institute of Transport Managements site shows no presence for Firepower at all.  Big surprise, I know.  

Looking a little deeper at their site you find that their awards appear to be presented &quot;bi-anuually&quot; by which I suspect, due to the complete lack of any awards for over a year now, they meant to say biennially - as in once every 2 years instead of twice per year.  If this is indeed the case, as the evidence suggets, then there is not even going to be a 2007 award as the awards were last presented on 10 November of 2006.

So... pretty typical for Firepower I'd say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hmm.. a quick look over the Institute of Transport Managements site shows no presence for Firepower at all.  Big surprise, I know.  </p>
	<p>Looking a little deeper at their site you find that their awards appear to be presented &#8220;bi-anuually&#8221; by which I suspect, due to the complete lack of any awards for over a year now, they meant to say biennially - as in once every 2 years instead of twice per year.  If this is indeed the case, as the evidence suggets, then there is not even going to be a 2007 award as the awards were last presented on 10 November of 2006.</p>
	<p>So&#8230; pretty typical for Firepower I&#8217;d say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: reyalp</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1575</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/11/18/trial-by-press-release/#comment-1575</guid>
					<description>Higher octane can also let you run more aggressive timing, so there is some potential benefit without going to higher compression (and some ECUs are even smart enough to adjust on they fly if they sense knocking.) but even the most optimistic case the gains are going to be down in the noise. 

The real reasons ECUs do this is so you don't damage your engine if you use substandard fuel.

In forced induction engine, you may also be able to run more boost, which again can be controlled by the ECU.

None of this negates the fact that firepower is a load of crap of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Higher octane can also let you run more aggressive timing, so there is some potential benefit without going to higher compression (and some ECUs are even smart enough to adjust on they fly if they sense knocking.) but even the most optimistic case the gains are going to be down in the noise. </p>
	<p>The real reasons ECUs do this is so you don&#8217;t damage your engine if you use substandard fuel.</p>
	<p>In forced induction engine, you may also be able to run more boost, which again can be controlled by the ECU.</p>
	<p>None of this negates the fact that firepower is a load of crap of course.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
