<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dare you enter&#8230; the Nostalgia Pit?</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ratkins</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1418</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:29:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1418</guid>
					<description>Excellent timing! I just moved and forced myself to chuck my small collection of ACARs (I kept the one in which I had an article published, of course).

I also kept my two &quot;Megacomp&quot; mags (never found a copy of the first edition). What the hell happened to those loonies? That was a great mag for the times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Excellent timing! I just moved and forced myself to chuck my small collection of ACARs (I kept the one in which I had an article published, of course).</p>
	<p>I also kept my two &#8220;Megacomp&#8221; mags (never found a copy of the first edition). What the hell happened to those loonies? That was a great mag for the times&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1364</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 09:08:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1364</guid>
					<description>[reply to comment 2]

I've never owned (or even touched) a copy of PC Review and I have definitely read the article in dead tree form...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[reply to comment 2]</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ve never owned (or even touched) a copy of PC Review and I have definitely read the article in dead tree form&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: UnderLord</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1363</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:30:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1363</guid>
					<description>I still think many of the tunes in my mod collection are better than a lot of todays MP3s, and of course the samples in the original MOD format were losslessly encoded.
Plenty of good tunes here if you're interested -
http://mody_collection.tripod.com/#MOD
I play them in WinAMP mostly mowadays, heck it still plays my CMF files!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I still think many of the tunes in my mod collection are better than a lot of todays MP3s, and of course the samples in the original MOD format were losslessly encoded.<br />
Plenty of good tunes here if you&#8217;re interested -<br />
<a href='http://mody_collection.tripod.com/#MOD' rel='nofollow'>http://mody_collection.tripod.com/#MOD</a><br />
I play them in WinAMP mostly mowadays, heck it still plays my CMF files!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RichVR</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1357</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:01:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1357</guid>
					<description>Sadly, pack rat that I am, I have stacks and stacks of old Commodore magazines of various types. Byte magazine as well. Before I packed them away I would reread them now and again. I always got a twinge of nostalgia looking at the Commodore program listings full of Peeks and Pokes and strings of zeroes and commas that I would invariably mistype and then have to &quot;debug&quot; for hours.

I also recall reading the ads for powerful new 386 systems at the bargain price of a kick ass Falcon or VooDoo system today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sadly, pack rat that I am, I have stacks and stacks of old Commodore magazines of various types. Byte magazine as well. Before I packed them away I would reread them now and again. I always got a twinge of nostalgia looking at the Commodore program listings full of Peeks and Pokes and strings of zeroes and commas that I would invariably mistype and then have to &#8220;debug&#8221; for hours.</p>
	<p>I also recall reading the ads for powerful new 386 systems at the bargain price of a kick ass Falcon or VooDoo system today.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: magetoo</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1353</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:01:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1353</guid>
					<description>ex-parrot:
As bruzie said, that is the naming convention on the Amiga.  I believe it might have started with NoiseTracker, and after a while, people started renaming music files from other programs to include a format prefix.  Then a new generation of trackers / music editors came out, and an unofficial standard was established.

The more &quot;formal&quot; standard was, of course, not to have extensions at all, but instead icon files with the relevant information.  Too much of a hassle for many programmers, it seems.  (And those .info files tended to not get distributed along with whatever they were supposed to describe anyway.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ex-parrot:<br />
As bruzie said, that is the naming convention on the Amiga.  I believe it might have started with NoiseTracker, and after a while, people started renaming music files from other programs to include a format prefix.  Then a new generation of trackers / music editors came out, and an unofficial standard was established.</p>
	<p>The more &#8220;formal&#8221; standard was, of course, not to have extensions at all, but instead icon files with the relevant information.  Too much of a hassle for many programmers, it seems.  (And those .info files tended to not get distributed along with whatever they were supposed to describe anyway.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bruzie</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1349</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:58:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1349</guid>
					<description>In the linked Wikipedia article, it states:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The original .mod extension is actually not a suffix on the Amiga, but a prefix; mod.* is the standard naming convention on the Amiga...&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In the linked Wikipedia article, it states:</p>
	<blockquote><p>The original .mod extension is actually not a suffix on the Amiga, but a prefix; mod.* is the standard naming convention on the Amiga&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ex-parrot</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1348</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:29:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1348</guid>
					<description>Why did the person who packaged that MOD file feel compelled to put the file extension at the start of the file name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why did the person who packaged that MOD file feel compelled to put the file extension at the start of the file name?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1345</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:53:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1345</guid>
					<description>Oh, lordy - that &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; originally a PC Review piece, wasn't it?

(I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/black.htm&quot;&gt;say as much&lt;/a&gt; in the Web version.)

Yes, I do have a stack of old PC Reviews, and yes, I'm aware that the maintainers of the archive would like me to scan them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, lordy - that <i>was</i> originally a PC Review piece, wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
	<p>(I <a href="http://www.dansdata.com/black.htm">say as much</a> in the Web version.)</p>
	<p>Yes, I do have a stack of old PC Reviews, and yes, I&#8217;m aware that the maintainers of the archive would like me to scan them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1339</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:08:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/08/31/dare-you-enter-the-nostalgia-pit/#comment-1339</guid>
					<description>The article in which you conclude that &quot;black computers go faster&quot; is still one of my favourites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The article in which you conclude that &#8220;black computers go faster&#8221; is still one of my favourites.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
