<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuel scam of the day</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-972</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 21:40:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-972</guid>
					<description>I've just updated the image with a nicer version from David, with the dude-unassociated-with-the-scam removed :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I've just updated the image with a nicer version from David, with the dude-unassociated-with-the-scam removed :-).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe Bloggs</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-970</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:22:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-970</guid>
					<description>As a HK resident, I remember there was an exhaust cleaning system based on water invented somewhere in these parts--simply bubble the exhaust through water to get rid of the particulates. Don't know where the fuel economy and fusion hoo-ha came in though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As a HK resident, I remember there was an exhaust cleaning system based on water invented somewhere in these parts--simply bubble the exhaust through water to get rid of the particulates. Don't know where the fuel economy and fusion hoo-ha came in though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: davidf</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-969</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 08:27:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-969</guid>
					<description>As Deep Throat in this article I should point out that the guy in the photograph has nothing to do with the contents of the story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As Deep Throat in this article I should point out that the guy in the photograph has nothing to do with the contents of the story
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alphacheez</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-968</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 07:03:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-968</guid>
					<description>The mention of helium means this better be a joke.  Up to that point it reads like the typical clueless reporter writing a story about something they don't understand.  Who could honestly think there is helium in gasoline, let alone somehow a combustion byproduct (which seems to be implied).  I imagine you could get pretty great fuel economy from a hydrogen fusion powered car though.  The only thing that would give you better energy output/fuel input would be a matter/antimatter system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The mention of helium means this better be a joke.  Up to that point it reads like the typical clueless reporter writing a story about something they don't understand.  Who could honestly think there is helium in gasoline, let alone somehow a combustion byproduct (which seems to be implied).  I imagine you could get pretty great fuel economy from a hydrogen fusion powered car though.  The only thing that would give you better energy output/fuel input would be a matter/antimatter system.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mohonri</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-967</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 23:33:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-967</guid>
					<description>Wow.  Anybody who's taken a high school chemistry course would be able to debunk this one.  Holy smokes!

Re:  Helium in gasoline--Helium is actually quite valuable, as things-that-come-out-of-the-ground go.  I work for an oil company, and there's a natural gas plant in Wyoming that actually gets (IIRC) 25% of its revenue from the production of helium, even though the helium comprises only about 2% of what comes out of the ground.  They work very hard to extract that helium, so there's practically none of it left in the natural gas when it leaves the plant.

Oh, and never mind that Helium, if any were actually present in the gasoline to begin with, would very &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; rapidly come out of solution and evaporate before it got from the gas pump to your gas tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow.  Anybody who's taken a high school chemistry course would be able to debunk this one.  Holy smokes!</p>
	<p>Re:  Helium in gasoline--Helium is actually quite valuable, as things-that-come-out-of-the-ground go.  I work for an oil company, and there's a natural gas plant in Wyoming that actually gets (IIRC) 25% of its revenue from the production of helium, even though the helium comprises only about 2% of what comes out of the ground.  They work very hard to extract that helium, so there's practically none of it left in the natural gas when it leaves the plant.</p>
	<p>Oh, and never mind that Helium, if any were actually present in the gasoline to begin with, would very <i>very</i> rapidly come out of solution and evaporate before it got from the gas pump to your gas tank.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: corinoco</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-966</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:00:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-966</guid>
					<description>* - my calculation, 60 seconds is too generous by far.

The entire 2nd last line should also read:

Ah, yes, but these &lt;strike&gt;imbeciles&lt;/strike&gt; guys I work with are architects - they may have designed a building &lt;i&gt;you may one day have to stand under.&lt;/i&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>* - my calculation, 60 seconds is too generous by far.</p>
	<p>The entire 2nd last line should also read:</p>
	<p>Ah, yes, but these <strike>imbeciles</strike> guys I work with are architects - they may have designed a building <i>you may one day have to stand under.</i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: corinoco</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-965</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:58:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-965</guid>
					<description>&quot;I could get around with no sunscreen in the middle of summer and not get burnt&quot;

Gimme some'o'that &lt;i&gt;&lt;em&gt;sheer teknoligy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.

He might have:
 1. Stayed in the shade.
 2. Not gone outside.
 3. Worn a good hat, sunglasses and long-sleeved shirt / trouser
 4. Stayed under the annual South-East Asian Smog Hood

All of which are entirely possible (and I can confirm that) in China. The 4th is thankfully not possible in Australia. &lt;i&gt;Yet.&lt;/i&gt;

3 guys at my office saw this article (or other reports in cat-litter filling (cough) newspapers and / or talkback radiation) &lt;i&gt;and believed every word&lt;/i&gt;.

&quot;So what&quot; you may say, &quot;there's a sucker born every 2 seconds*&quot;

Ah, yes, but these &lt;strike&gt;imbeciles&lt;/strike&gt; guys I work with are architects - they they have design buildings &lt;i&gt;you may one day have to stand under&lt;/i&gt;.

Be afraid; and hope you stand under one of mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>"I could get around with no sunscreen in the middle of summer and not get burnt"</p>
	<p>Gimme some'o'that <i><em>sheer teknoligy</em></i>.</p>
	<p>He might have:<br />
 1. Stayed in the shade.<br />
 2. Not gone outside.<br />
 3. Worn a good hat, sunglasses and long-sleeved shirt / trouser<br />
 4. Stayed under the annual South-East Asian Smog Hood</p>
	<p>All of which are entirely possible (and I can confirm that) in China. The 4th is thankfully not possible in Australia. <i>Yet.</i></p>
	<p>3 guys at my office saw this article (or other reports in cat-litter filling (cough) newspapers and / or talkback radiation) <i>and believed every word</i>.</p>
	<p>"So what" you may say, "there's a sucker born every 2 seconds*"</p>
	<p>Ah, yes, but these <strike>imbeciles</strike> guys I work with are architects - they they have design buildings <i>you may one day have to stand under</i>.</p>
	<p>Be afraid; and hope you stand under one of mine!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-964</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:05:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-964</guid>
					<description>Perhaps the RACV are after another award?

http://www.skeptics.com.au/spoon/aboutthespoon.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Perhaps the RACV are after another award?</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.skeptics.com.au/spoon/aboutthespoon.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.skeptics.com.au/spoon/aboutthespoon.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt W</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-962</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:45:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-962</guid>
					<description>Hilarious. Probably the most cringe inducing article yet.
My vote is for collective imbecility at the RACV and Box Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hilarious. Probably the most cringe inducing article yet.<br />
My vote is for collective imbecility at the RACV and Box Hill.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Gordon</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-961</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:39:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/05/03/fuel-scam-of-the-day/#comment-961</guid>
					<description>Of course, if he was in a big Chinese city, then Kevin might have been protected from the sun's damaging rays by airborne pollution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Of course, if he was in a big Chinese city, then Kevin might have been protected from the sun's damaging rays by airborne pollution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

