<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An extraordinary coincidence</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rob L</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-765</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-765</guid>
					<description>Trouble with SupCom is that after playing Company of Heroes it's like stepping from The Longest Day to Starblazers.  It's just all to shiney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trouble with SupCom is that after playing Company of Heroes it's like stepping from The Longest Day to Starblazers.  It's just all to shiney.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: stewpot</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-764</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-764</guid>
					<description>Dan, I suppose they could. But if they were orthogonal, they'd have no reason for conflict. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dan, I suppose they could. But if they were orthogonal, they'd have no reason for conflict. :-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Darkside</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-763</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-763</guid>
					<description>Ooooh be careful there Dan, I don't know how many people think in 3D ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ooooh be careful there Dan, I don't know how many people think in 3D ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Moetop</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-762</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-762</guid>
					<description>Dear lord I useualy read things through., But I didnt click that link (The text was not enticing enough :) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear lord I useualy read things through., But I didnt click that link (The text was not enticing enough :) )
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-761</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-761</guid>
					<description>Well, I suppose they could be on three perpendicular axes... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, I suppose they could be on three perpendicular axes... :-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: stewpot</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-760</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-760</guid>
					<description>Just checked out the SupCom home page, and I'm now wondering how three factions can be diametrically opposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just checked out the SupCom home page, and I'm now wondering how three factions can be diametrically opposed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wire_Geek</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-759</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-759</guid>
					<description>I just sent this to the fine folks that make Supreme Commander.

Hello, 

I have a quick bit of background information, and an easy question regarding availability of the Supreme Commander game.

I recently (~2 weeks ago) finalized the hardware buildout and initial installation on my new computer. I'm pushing a GeForce 8800gts, 2gb of DDR2, and a Core 2 Duo 6600 on an Asus p5e-SLI motherboard. I can run Half-Life 2 at my monitor's maximum display resolution (3360x1050!) with maximum prettiness, and still churn over 30fps on average.

And I really want to throw Supreme Commander at it. Dan, of Dan's Data, at http://dansdata.blogsome.com, highly reccomends your game. I was a Total Annihlation fan, and a huge Starcraft junkie, so.... 

So I'm looking down the barrel of the game that could consume every erg of brainpower and spare time I have for several years. I'm looking at advanced online play, which would lead to me buying multiple copies to gift to cannonfodder. I'm looking at _multiple monitor support_, which gives me a rather advanced case of technolust. 

I'm looking at, to quote Dan, &quot;_The_ RTS for the next ten years&quot;

And I can't install it.

I made a deal with myself that when myself bought myself a new computer, myself would not cripple it with any malware, spyware, blortware, or whatever fancy term you care to apply to software that is intended to cause problems. Given the presence of SecuROM II software on your game disc, It is not eligible for installation onto my system.

In conclusion, when will an instance of this game be available on physical media , either online or retail, that does not involve a CD protection system I find morally offensive? 

Sincerely, 

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just sent this to the fine folks that make Supreme Commander.</p>
	<p>Hello, </p>
	<p>I have a quick bit of background information, and an easy question regarding availability of the Supreme Commander game.</p>
	<p>I recently (~2 weeks ago) finalized the hardware buildout and initial installation on my new computer. I'm pushing a GeForce 8800gts, 2gb of DDR2, and a Core 2 Duo 6600 on an Asus p5e-SLI motherboard. I can run Half-Life 2 at my monitor's maximum display resolution (3360x1050!) with maximum prettiness, and still churn over 30fps on average.</p>
	<p>And I really want to throw Supreme Commander at it. Dan, of Dan's Data, at <a href='http://dansdata.blogsome.com' rel='nofollow'>http://dansdata.blogsome.com</a>, highly reccomends your game. I was a Total Annihlation fan, and a huge Starcraft junkie, so.... </p>
	<p>So I'm looking down the barrel of the game that could consume every erg of brainpower and spare time I have for several years. I'm looking at advanced online play, which would lead to me buying multiple copies to gift to cannonfodder. I'm looking at _multiple monitor support_, which gives me a rather advanced case of technolust. </p>
	<p>I'm looking at, to quote Dan, "_The_ RTS for the next ten years"</p>
	<p>And I can't install it.</p>
	<p>I made a deal with myself that when myself bought myself a new computer, myself would not cripple it with any malware, spyware, blortware, or whatever fancy term you care to apply to software that is intended to cause problems. Given the presence of SecuROM II software on your game disc, It is not eligible for installation onto my system.</p>
	<p>In conclusion, when will an instance of this game be available on physical media , either online or retail, that does not involve a CD protection system I find morally offensive? </p>
	<p>Sincerely, </p>
	<p>Nick
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-758</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-758</guid>
					<description>Use the links, Luke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Use the links, Luke.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Moetop</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-757</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/22/an-extraordinary-coincidence/#comment-757</guid>
					<description>I am surprised you don't mention the TA spring project http://spring.clan-sy.com/ basically open source TA.

I also find the multi monitor support quite useful. Selecting units on the zoomed in view and clicking on the zoomed out view on the other screen to issue marching orders. This makes it so you don't loose your carefully positioned zoomed in view. It allows for a build screen and a tactical screen and the zooming and panning of each to not interfere.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am surprised you don't mention the TA spring project <a href='http://spring.clan-sy.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://spring.clan-sy.com/</a> basically open source TA.</p>
	<p>I also find the multi monitor support quite useful. Selecting units on the zoomed in view and clicking on the zoomed out view on the other screen to issue marching orders. This makes it so you don't loose your carefully positioned zoomed in view. It allows for a build screen and a tactical screen and the zooming and panning of each to not interfere.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
