<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PayPal money laundering scam</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ryanlrussell</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-686</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-686</guid>
					<description>I've forwarded your post to a private eBay security contact. You will probably be hearing from them soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I've forwarded your post to a private eBay security contact. You will probably be hearing from them soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RichVR</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-685</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-685</guid>
					<description>It's obvious that this is a shady deal. Everyone knows that crack isn't a narcotic. It's a stimulant. That should set off alarm bells, right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It's obvious that this is a shady deal. Everyone knows that crack isn't a narcotic. It's a stimulant. That should set off alarm bells, right there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sean</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-684</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-684</guid>
					<description>I'd be guessing that this is some form of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_mule&quot; title=&quot;money mule&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;money mule&lt;/a&gt; advert, though surprisingly unsophisticated and unlikely to actually launder funds - weird, eh?. 

Gosh, sounds too good to be true! Free Money! gimme gimme gimme!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I'd be guessing that this is some form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_mule" title="money mule" rel="nofollow">money mule</a> advert, though surprisingly unsophisticated and unlikely to actually launder funds - weird, eh?. </p>
	<p>Gosh, sounds too good to be true! Free Money! gimme gimme gimme!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chiefnewo</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-683</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-683</guid>
					<description>Pornography involving the other two options, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Pornography involving the other two options, of course.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Oosh</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-682</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-682</guid>
					<description>More importantly, which would you choose; an animal gelding, narcotics, or pornography?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>More importantly, which would you choose; an animal gelding, narcotics, or pornography?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Rutter</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-680</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-680</guid>
					<description>Yeah, and you'd probably also be out the penalties PayPal charges you for &quot;fraud&quot; - which is what you're assumed to have committed if someone sends you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dansdata.com/email.htm&quot;&gt;money for nothing&lt;/a&gt; and then files a complaint saying you didn't send them the thing they didn't actually buy from you.

(That's only happened to me once, but it was still annoying.)

And if your account then got frozen, you might well not, yourself, be able to file complaints about the dude you sent the money on to. It's not as if you could plausibly claim you thought it was a perfectly sensible business deal, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, and you'd probably also be out the penalties PayPal charges you for "fraud" - which is what you're assumed to have committed if someone sends you <a href="http://www.dansdata.com/email.htm">money for nothing</a> and then files a complaint saying you didn't send them the thing they didn't actually buy from you.</p>
	<p>(That's only happened to me once, but it was still annoying.)</p>
	<p>And if your account then got frozen, you might well not, yourself, be able to file complaints about the dude you sent the money on to. It's not as if you could plausibly claim you thought it was a perfectly sensible business deal, after all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marco</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-679</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2007/02/04/paypal-money-laundering-scam/#comment-679</guid>
					<description>Seems like the fraudulent part here would be that all of the inbound payments would bounce and you'd just be out the 50% you sent out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Seems like the fraudulent part here would be that all of the inbound payments would bounce and you'd just be out the 50% you sent out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

