<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-I-E-I-O</title>
	<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/</link>
	<description>the blog that is not dansdata.com</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Klyith</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/#comment-289</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/#comment-289</guid>
					<description>nmr8 - it can be done with user scripts like the Firefox extension Greasemonkey. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.userscripts.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Userscripts.org&lt;/a&gt; has a few examples, most of which seem to work on the same principles. I use scripts that remove &lt;a href=&quot;http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/876&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about.com&lt;/a&gt; (wikipedia ripoff) or &lt;a href=&quot;http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1898&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;experts-exchange.com&lt;/a&gt; from google search results. Copying a script and editing for a different domain would be easy.

But I doubt you can do the same for link farms, there are simply too many domains in play. It's normally better to just let google do the pagerank thing. If you are doing searches where link farms can actually compete with real results (searches for torrents and warez have this problem) it is better to just use a &quot;specialty&quot; search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>nmr8 - it can be done with user scripts like the Firefox extension Greasemonkey. <a href="http://www.userscripts.org/" rel="nofollow">Userscripts.org</a> has a few examples, most of which seem to work on the same principles. I use scripts that remove <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/876" rel="nofollow">about.com</a> (wikipedia ripoff) or <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1898" rel="nofollow">experts-exchange.com</a> from google search results. Copying a script and editing for a different domain would be easy.</p>
	<p>But I doubt you can do the same for link farms, there are simply too many domains in play. It&#8217;s normally better to just let google do the pagerank thing. If you are doing searches where link farms can actually compete with real results (searches for torrents and warez have this problem) it is better to just use a &#8220;specialty&#8221; search engine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris McMahon</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/#comment-288</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/#comment-288</guid>
					<description>Dan,
Any idea how to combat a spammer using your address as the sender? I've been getting bounce messages and complaints about sending spam for weeks now and it's annoying as hell.

The spam seems to be sent from a number of different IPs (none of them mine), so either my address has been sold to a number of spammers, or it's being used from a botnet.

Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dan,<br />
Any idea how to combat a spammer using your address as the sender? I&#8217;ve been getting bounce messages and complaints about sending spam for weeks now and it&#8217;s annoying as hell.</p>
	<p>The spam seems to be sent from a number of different IPs (none of them mine), so either my address has been sold to a number of spammers, or it&#8217;s being used from a botnet.</p>
	<p>Any ideas?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nmr8</title>
		<link>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/#comment-287</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/e-i-e-i-o/#comment-287</guid>
					<description>i wonder if it would be hard to customize google searches to not consider a given set of domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i wonder if it would be hard to customize google searches to not consider a given set of domains.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
