Apparently, “this page requires additional images.”
The point goes unremarked on the discussion page, which is as lengthy as can be expected for such a weighty topic.
I love Wikipedia talk pages. They’re not just more entertaining than most of the main entries (with certain obvious exceptions), but can be more informative too.
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://dansdata.blogsome.com/2006/11/05/i-dont-think-it-really-does/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Please register and login before leaving a comment.
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Get your free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
From the talk page:
"Diagram needed"?!
Uh, does anyone really think it's necessary for this article to have a diagram? God, I hope this is a joke, unless Wikipedia is turning into Goatsepedia. (;^_^;) Akira 07:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment by Orpheus — November 6, 2006 @ 12:17 am
Ah, that was for an earlier "Diagram needed" tag. The current "Image needed" tag was added about 18 hours ago.
Comment by Orpheus — November 6, 2006 @ 12:20 am
Clearly, what's really needed is an interactive 3D animation.
Comment by Daniel Rutter — November 6, 2006 @ 12:56 am
Time to update your virtual porn column perhaps? A call to arms to the world's animators to work on this tragic omission from Wikipedia?
Comment by Orpheus — November 6, 2006 @ 1:43 am